Showing posts with label DNA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label DNA. Show all posts

Monday, October 8, 2012

Vaccination Exemptions

Since the influenza vaccination blog, I have received many comments and requests for additional information about the legal exemption for vaccination.  North Carolina Vaccination Law offers two options:

  1. The medical exemption requires that a physician certifies the vaccination would be “detrimental to a person’s health due to the presence of one of the contraindications” for that vaccination.  An example of a contraindication includes anyone with an allergy to any component of the vaccination including eggs.  Another possibility is anyone that is immunocompromised.   
  2. The religeous exemption requires the individual to submit a “written statement of the bona fide religious beliefs and opposition to the immunization requirements, the person may attend the college, university, school or facility without presenting a certificate of immunization.
Just for the record, I am not a biblical scholar.  A common religious or spiritual principle is to keep the body pure.  While few of us will reach a state of perfection, many still strive to take care of their body by making healthful choices.  This includes not consciously taking in toxic material.  Some basic tenants of a religious or spiritual exemption may include:

  1. A religious or spiritual biblical concept that views the body as a temple of God.  (1 Corinthians 3:16-17, 1 Corinthians 6:19-20)
  2. Blood purity and the warning against the mixing of blood. (Leviticus 17:14)  There are other biblical references to blood.  Many vaccinations are blood products. 
  3. There are some that make a case forbidding the combination of genetic material.   Leviticus 19:19 warns against mixing two different seeds in a field.  This practice results in cross-pollination which may alter the viability of the seed.  To maintain the purity of a seed means not mixing foreign RNA or DNA.  Vaccines are or contain foreign RNA or DNA.  This practice theoretically means that the substance can combine with our genetic material, creating a mutation.  This translates into potential cancer or other health issues. 
 I can only conclude that prepared immunizations do not conform to scriptural rules for hygiene.ealth care decisions on behalf of their children.  
The Pastoral Medical Association statement is as follows:  
The PMA encourages individuals to seek informed professional advice, considering both the scientific as well as the scriptural in all health matters affecting themselves or their families. We believe and support the God given right of every individual to choose or refuse conventional ideas that conflict with their sincerely held religious beliefs, as so ordained in the Supreme Law of the Creator.

Tuesday, May 29, 2012

Autism and Natural Immunity



There is nothing of more concern to a parent than his or her child.  Certainly, a child’s health is paramount and the rise of autism is alarming.  The Center for Disease Control (CDC) reports that in 2000 the rate was 1 child in 150.  In 2008 it was 1 in 88 children.  The rate for boys is 1 in 54 and girls 1 in 252.  This is scary as this disease was virtually unknown 20 years ago.  So what is the cause?

Autism is a neurological disease that is associated with problems in the development of brain and nerve tissue.  Metals such as mercury, lead and aluminum are known neurotoxins.  Mercury actually causes the myelin sheath covering nerves to be destroyed.SEE UNIVESITY OF CALGARY VIDEO.    Lead is associated with learning defects in children.  Aluminum is associated with impaired learning and reduced motor coordination. 

It is highly likely that such metals may contribute to autism.  It is also likely that there are other contributing factors that have yet to be identified.  This could include immune system disorders, and the toxic load of the mother from the environment.  A 2005 study reported over 200 different chemicals in each newborns umbilical cord blood sample.    Looking for a single cause will not solve the problem.  Illness usually has a number of factors that come together to create disease.

In 1994, North Carolina enacted a law that required hepatitis B virus (HBV) vaccination for all children.  Current vaccination for HBV is started on the day the infant is born, followed by a shot at the fourth and 16th week of life. This is just one of many vaccinations to follow.  HBV vaccine is made from a fungus using “recombinant” technology.  Recombinant means genetically engineered.  Recombinant technology has brought us human insulin. 

Information found in the vaccination manufacturer’s package insert states that the product contains no more than 5 percent of yeast protein.  This translates into RNA or DNA, which is genetic material.  This is unknown RNA or DNA, which, in theory, can interact with our genetic material.  It also reveals that the vaccination contains aluminum and thimerosal.  The thimerosal is a preservative that contains mercury and is reported to be in “trace amounts” in a concentration that is technically not a preservative. 

So if you have a known substance that causes a problem, would you think the first step would be to eliminate the source of the problem?  If I had a room full of puppies, should I keep cleaning up after them or just put them outside?    The first principle of wellness should be to eliminate any source of a toxin entering the body.  This is simple common sense.  However, in medicine it seems that we must study the problem and get a consensus as the problem gets worse.  Science is not always scientific.

Let’s assume that a pregnant woman is already infected with HBV.  Does it stand to reason that the infant already has the virus?  Can the vaccine protect the child from something it already has?  HBV is transmitted by sexual contact, contaminated blood and/or illegal IV drug use.  So if you are a parent that does not fall in the behavior of common transmission then what is the actual risk to your child?  If your job is in the health care field then you have already taken the HBV shots.  If the vaccine works then your immunity is passed on to the infant through breast-feeding.  The last possibility is that the infant contracts the virus in the hospital.  Hopefully this is not likely.  What is the actual risk of contracting the disease and what are the potential risks of the treatment?

A newborn does not have an intact immune system, which is why breast-feeding is important.  The child gets its immunity from the mother.  Can the baby’s immune system really respond in a positive way to the vaccination?  The very question is unreasonable.  Also, the infant’s brain is not fully developed; even if it were, would you really want to give a known neurotoxin in any amount?  Scientific researchers continue to tell us that vaccinations are not the cause of autism.  They may not be the only cause but are they a contributing factor?  Even if they are right, we are still in violation of risk verses benefits.  We are trained to believe vaccinations prevent disease.  Have you ever Googled “Vaccine Injury”?  Health care is about choices. 
Be informed. 
Be well!

This blog is written for informational purposes only.  This information should not be used for the diagnosis, as a recommendation for treatment, nor should it be considered a replacement for consultation with a healthcare professional.  If you have questions or concerns about your health, please contact your healthcare provider.

Thursday, May 10, 2012

Natural Born Instinct

Warning:  This blog contains graphic descriptions of the birth process in dogs.  If you are faint of heart, perhaps you should wait for the next post.



Have you ever watched a bitch have her first litter of puppies?  She will stop eating a few days before the event.  If not confined, she may go off to create a nest for the newborns.  It seems almost effortless, one slides out, she takes the pup in her mouth, tears off the sack and licks the puppy to life.  This happens again and again.  She eats the placenta and may eat any puppies born dead.  We assume this cannibalistic instinct is to keep the nest clean so as to not attract any unwanted predators.  She nestles them in a semicircle for warmth and protection.  The puppies’ eyes are closed but they are able to find a nipple for nourishment.  The mother keeps her babies’ bowels moving and clean by licking them.  She is protective and is distressed if one is removed.  The nature of instinct, an innate ability, and knowing things that were previously unknown!  Amazing!

So is instinct purely DNA?  How about the concept of cellular or body memory?  This is where life experiences have some impact on the individual and a “memory” is stored somewhere other than the brain.  Many breeders of sporting dogs believe that a dog that has been hunted will produce offspring with better hunting instincts.  Breeding emphasis is usually placed on the sire.  And yet it is the mother that contributes more to the offspring.  One reason is that while DNA is known to be in the nucleus of the cell, there is actually DNA in the cytoplasm of the egg.  But it is obvious that the overall health of the mother will reflect in the offspring.  Most human health care focuses on prenatal and postnatal care.  Preconception care is the overlooked part of a healthy pregnancy, birth, and offspring.

There were 9 pups found after work, one dead being held in the mouth of the mother. Another one died later in the evening.  The next day, I received a call from home that she had another pup that was dead.  She ate the dead pup.  The veterinarian came for an exam and administered a shot of oxytocin to stimulate uterine contractions.  This was almost 18 hours after what was thought to be the last-born.  Two more puppies were immediately born. One pronounced dead by the vet and was placed in a bag.  The other was a runt about one-fourth the size of the others.  A few minutes later, the bag is moving; that puppy is not dead. So now there are nine- four males, 5 females.  The 13th was found in the yard the next day and was about 2 inches long.

The runt was not doing well.  There was too much competition from the littermates.  Mom was holding the pup in her mouth in the same way she held the other dead.  This one may have to be bottle-fed, so off to the store for some goats milk which was a wasted trip as the pup was too weak.  Her little head dropped off the side of my wife’s hand.  The pup needed energy.  Homeopathy?

Which remedy…perhaps phosphorous…fire!  There was no homeopathic phosphorous but there was a tube of Magnesia phosphorica 30C.  One little pellet in the side of her mouth was almost too large for this pup.  Within a few minutes there was a little more movement.  This runt was offered one of mom’s nipples that she latched onto with new vigor.  Mom kept trying to remove the pup but was denied her instinct.  Runt was allowed to nurse every couple of hours and was soon able to refuse her brothers and sisters from taking her teat.

Meanwhile, the puppy that came back from the dead is alive and well.  The biblical female raised from the dead was Tabitha interpreted as Dorcas.  Perhaps we should call her Dorcas as Tabitha for a dog just does not work.  Either one of these pups might just be a keeper.  Amazing life!